There are numerous benefits to filing a Provisional Patent Application. While not a requirement in the patent procurement process, in many cases a Provisional may be the only viable alternative in order to preserve the inventor’s potential patent rights. The relative low cost to file a Provisional is so significant that cost should not be a factor in considering whether to file. Given the enormous upside to filing a Provisional, and considering that its cost for preparing and filing is perhaps 5% of that for a non-provisional, a Provisional patent application just may be the bargain of the century. Continue reading →
Posted in Patent
|
Tagged claiming priority, confidentiality agreement, enablement, invention disclosure, inventions, NDA, non-disclosure agreement, non-provisional patent application, patent pending, patent prosecution, patents, priority date, provisional patent application, section 102 (novelty), section 102 bar date, USPTO
|
IPWatchdog, one of the longest running Intellectual Property based blogs, and its founder, patent attorney guru Gene Quinn, responded to, in this writer’s opinion a totally frivolous lawsuit, filed by the infamous InventHelp seeking to “silence” Mr. Quinn and his site from airing the public – and notoriously well-known – grievances by enthusiastic inventors and product creators who have allegedly been defrauded by InventHelp. Continue reading →
Posted in In the News, Patent, Social Media and Web 2.0
|
Tagged blog, Davison, defamation, First Amendment, freedom of speech, InventHelp, invention submission companies, inventions, IPWatchdog, lawsuit, litigation, patents, social media
|
In two law suits filed last week with the Office of the United States International Trade Commission and in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Apple sued HTC, the Taiwanese company that is the largest maker of smart phones running Google’s Android operating system, including the Nexus One, designed and sold by Google. Apple claims that HTC phones running Android violated 20 of its patents, including the iPhone’s ability to recognize the touch of multiple fingers on its screen at once. Continue reading →
Posted in In the News, Patent
|
Tagged Android, apple, google, HTC, iPhone, patent infringement, patent litigation, section 102 (novelty), section 103 (obviousness), smart phone technology, Steve Jobs
|